This lays it out pretty well, and the think tank is laying it out as to what they want to do. And the Muslims are perfect for this role as the Antichrist will be the Muslim Mahdi, or their Messiah. And Islam has a perfect mirror to Christian eschatology with their Mahdi matching our Antichrist, their Isa, Jesus, matching the false prophet who aids Antichrist, and they’re a murderous lot ready to kill Jews and Christian who won’t convert… And this is ramping up pretty quickly and explains why they’ve kept the Ukraine war going when peace is the logical and easy option.
By Tyler Durden
Europe’s lack of military readiness has become painfully obvious in recent years, due largely to the war in Ukraine as well as the Trump Administration’s efforts to force NATO members to fulfill their basic obligations.
Specifically, Russia’s successful use of attrition tactics against NATO supported forces in Ukraine has exposed a significant weakness in western military doctrine.
New and cheap technologies (including drone technologies) are making large scale maneuver warfare obsolete. The era of super-weapons dominating the battlefield with minimal manpower is over. As was the case in WWI and WWII, troop strength and boots on the ground are once again the key to victory.
A Washington DC-based defense think-tank, Center For A New American Century (CNAS), has come to the same realization and suggests a novel (as well as predictable) solution: Exploit mass immigration from Ukraine and third world countries to the west as a resource to fill the persistent void in military recruitment numbers.
Writing for Foreign Policy, the CNAS notes:
“Closing manpower gaps may prove harder than writing bigger checks. The continent’s demographic crisis compounds the problem: Births in the European Union fell below 4 million in 2022 for the first time since 1960, shrinking the pool of potential recruits as geopolitical threats—chief among them, Russian aggression—demand larger, more capable forces…”
The argument, of course, presupposes that Russia has any intention of invading greater Europe. There is no evidence that this is Vladimir Putin’s goal. However, the Russian bogeyman does make for a useful excuse to justify the development of a unified EU military force.
The threat of war can also be exploited by European officials as a way to justify open borders and mass immigration from the third world. Immigration from Ukraine makes some sense – It is a legitimate war torn country and Ukrainians are close to the rest of Europeans in terms of cultural attitude. But, EU elites need a rationale for flooding the region with third worlders and war with Russia seems to be their ticket. The CNAS uses the “demographic collapse” claim as a catalyst.
“Ukraine’s grinding war of attrition has laid bare an uncomfortable truth: Emerging capabilities in the form of high-tech weaponry cannot substitute for boots on the ground. Soldiers, sailors, marines, coast guardsmen, and airmen are the backbone of national defense. Yet the European Commission estimates a 43 million reduction in the bloc’s working-age population by 2070…”
“…Meanwhile, Europe continues to grapple with significant migration flows from Africa, the Middle East, and other regions. These arrivals, often young, male, and seeking better opportunities, represent exactly the demographic cohort European militaries desperately need. Many migrants arrive with valuable skills: language abilities, cultural knowledge of strategic regions, technical expertise, and, most importantly, motivation to prove themselves and build new lives.”
It should be noted that these kind of articles from think-tanks are not so much “suggestions” for future policy initiatives. Rather, they are propaganda pieces designed to promote policies that governments already intend to implement in the near future.
A number of European countries have already begun the groundwork for recruiting migrants for national defense.
Ireland just recently announced that their are reviewing a possible program to give fast-track citizenship to immigrants who volunteer to join the military. Irish leaders assert that this is necessary to boost defense capabilities, but they also argue that it is need to increase Ireland’s “diversity.”
Several other European governments are looking at similar programs, including Germany, France and Spain.
The real question is, would third world migrants actually fight on the front lines for Europe? Furthermore, is this really the true agenda behind mass immigration? To boost western demographics to defend against invasion, or to support the economy?
It is clear that third worlders are a net negative on the economic health of the countries they migrate to. The majority represent a drain on social welfare systems. Europe is on a downward spiral in terms of economic health and crime over the past decade. In fact, the more European leaders embrace mass immigration, the more the economy declines and the worse their native demographic crisis becomes.
It makes more sense if one considers the possibility that mass immigration and military recruitment are designed to keep European citizens in line, not Russia or Putin. As we mentioned in our recent article on Canada’s new program to recruit military trained foreign nationals for their own armed forces, left-wing governments are not really worried about invasion from Russia or China, they are worried about opposition from their own conservative and nationalist populations.
It is much easier to control native Europeans using immigrant mercenaries with no loyalty to the culture. The CNAS specifically mentions the use of military service as a way to sooth the concerns of “xenophobic” conservatives.
“The political center regarding migration has collapsed in the face of far-right xenophobic approaches to the migration file, such that few policy initiatives other than hardening land and maritime borders and cutting deals to send migrants away see the light of day…”
“The promise of citizenship provides powerful motivation, and military service demonstrates commitment to the nation in the most tangible way possible. The United States demonstrates that national identity is forged through shared sacrifice, not shared ancestry…”
In other words, sell Europeans on the idea that they have no shared ancestry and that migrants going to war for them is proof enough that they are loyal and should be citizens. Of course, it’s unlikely that migrants will be convinced to risk their lives for Europeans. They might, however, be easily convinced to help oppress Europeans in exchange for citizenship and the spoils of subjugation.
It’s a threat western citizens need to seriously consider before supporting any government policy for the recruitment of foreign nationals. They might just be supporting the very recruits that will eventually be used to enslave them.