And the OCGFC use their control to reign in Trump, but a lot of what he’s done has been underwhelming when you dig into it, so this was always the plan, as our country is still run by the same billionaires including Trump. I wonder if I’ll get my $103.20 tariff on the Coldard Q back, though FedEx will keep the $15 handling fee, or perhaps charge another. Would this cost the American taxpayer more than was ever collected?
The ruling is a direct constraint on presidents using emergency statutes to impose economy-wide import taxes without explicit congressional authorization.
By ER Velasco
The US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs were illegal, ending a core pillar of his trade strategy.
In a 6–3 decision led by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court held that IEEPA, a 1977 statute historically used for sanctions and other emergency economic controls, does not authorize the president to impose broad tariffs of this scale absent clear congressional approval.
The Court leaned on the “major questions” doctrine, treating global tariffs as an action of vast economic and political significance that requires explicit authorization from Congress, not an implied reading of emergency powers.
Trump justified the duties as an emergency response to fentanyl and trade deficits and applied the program across Canada, China, Mexico, and effectively most US trading partners.
Challenges were brought by affected businesses and 12 Democratic-led states, arguing the measures functioned as unauthorized taxes paid by Americans.
Reuters reported the IEEPA-based tariffs generated an estimated $175.0 billion and were forecast to raise trillions more over time, while a separate widely circulated projection cited $1.5 trillion over a decade.
Tariff refund?
Refund exposure is now the immediate operational question. A Penn Wharton Budget Model analysis also cited the roughly $175.0 billion figure and estimated about $500.0 million of IEEPA-related revenue collected per day at peak are at risk with the decision, with refunds potentially tied to duties paid since February 2025 depending on how remedies are structured.
Sen, Elizabeth Warren urged refunds after the decision, and market pricing shifted toward that outcome. Kalshi’s market for a court-ordered tariff refund before July 2026 moved to around 66%, according to the market and related reporting.
*WARREN URGES REFUNDS FOR AMERICANS AFTER SUPREME COURT RULING https://t.co/int9ZcP5zb— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) February 20, 2026
Trump called the decision a “disgrace” and said he has a “backup plan” to pursue tariffs through other legal avenues, though Reuters noted alternatives may not match IEEPA’s scope or speed.
Internationally, Canada said the ruling reinforces its position that the IEEPA tariffs were unjustified, signaling that allied governments will now focus on how quickly the US unwinds collections and whether replacement tariffs emerge under narrower tools.