What’s more interesting than the article, is the Wikipedia page for the World Council for Health formed in 2021 (posted below the headline article). For a lot of topics, Wikipedia has become trash. Basically, they cite anything published by the Megacorp Propaganda Press as their source, and you can’t have truthful information when the cited material is worthless paid for propaganda. And to dispute the Wikipedia claims, they admit myocarditus and pericarditus as an adverse effect of the mRNA gene therapies, and we’ve all seen the people that have dropped dead from cardiac arrest because of it. It’s just that they refuse to study adverse effects in any meaningful way, all while people are harmed and dying from the medical experiment that they were conned into trusting. The takeaway is you better stop blindly trusting those white coats, or they’ll harm or kill you. And they don’t seem to care after the fact at all, as many are still pushing the gene therapies.
By Frank Bergman

The World Council for Health has issued a chilling red alert to the public to warn of a “ticking time bomb” of looming deaths, disease, and injuries among the billions of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The warning comes as global health bureaucrats and pharmaceutical giants continue pushing Covid mRNA shots.
However, these new revelations about the chemical delivery system used in these injections are now sending shockwaves through scientific communities.
At the center of the controversy is lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which serve as “biological grenades” in the bodies of those who received the experimental injections..
LNPs are microscopic synthetic fat particles used to deliver mRNA into human cells.
Originally sold as cutting-edge “safe and effective” technology, these LNPs are now under scrutiny for potential long-term toxicity, metabolic disruption, and triggering of autoimmune or neurodegenerative conditions.
Despite these concerns, after billions were injected with unvetted nano-tech, Pfizer, Moderna, and government regulators are stonewalling even basic safety questions.
One basic question that remains unanswered: How many LNPs are in a single Covid “vaccine” dose?
When eminent German researcher Maria Gutschi tried to find out, she got a disturbing response.
Gutschi hit mRNA “vaccine” maker Moderna with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
However, according to Gutschi, Moderna’s response was:
“We don’t know, and it’s irrelevant.”
Gutschi said she also presented the same question to the UK’s drug regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), but didn’t receive a response.
This lack of transparency has alarmed experts and watchdogs.
According to a report from the World Council for Health (WCH):
“Billions of people have been injected with a poorly characterised chemical delivery system – and now we’re just starting to see the fallout.”
The WCH warns that the injections are “acting like a slow-release poison,” which has created a “ticking time bomb” among the global population.
German researcher Genervter Bürger reports that only one scientific paper includes mass and numerical data of LNPs.
The study detected Moderna’s SM-102, an ionisable lipid, lingering in the bloodstream seven days post-injection, still above background levels.
Keep in mind — this is a synthetic, non-human lipid.
As Bürger explains, comparing it to “background levels” is like saying a trace of arsenic in your coffee is fine.
Meanwhile, Pfizer’s proprietary lipid, ALC-0315, has its own set of issues.
Fresh vials showed 0.19% oxidized impurities, and the most reactive components weren’t even fully tested.
And oxidized lipids? They’re “biological grenades” that:
- Bind inflammatory receptors like TLRs and PPARs
- Disrupt calcium signaling and metabolism
- Promote lysosomal (cellular waste disposal) dysfunction
A landmark scientific review, The Chemical Reactivity of Membrane Lipids, warned:
“When primary amines are present in membranes (e.g., sphingosine), reactive aldehydes can crosslink them, triggering vesicle aggregation.”
In layman’s terms: these particles don’t just deliver mRNA — they can wreak havoc on cell membranes.
From cholesterol ratios that accelerate lipid breakdown to tertiary amines that interfere with cellular receptors, the evidence suggests that slow, systemic toxicity from these particles may be flying completely under the radar.
The unanswered question: Were some batches more toxic than others?
With no batch consistency data released, the public may never know.
“We need transparency from both the vaccine manufacturers and drug regulators,” the WHC warns.
That means batch testing, LNP quantification, oxidation monitoring, and — most critically — long-term follow-up to understand how long these synthetic particles linger and what damage they might cause.
As the World Council for Health continues to push for the withdrawal of these experimental gene therapies, the silence from Big Pharma and public health agencies is deafening — and deeply troubling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Council_for_Health
World Council for Health (Wikipedia)
The World Council for Health is a pseudo-medical organisation dedicated to spreading misinformation to discourage COVID-19 vaccination, and promoting fake COVID-19 treatments.[1]
The organization’s online appearance is that of a mainstream health organization.[2] It appears to have been formed in September 2021 and its published leadership contains people which an Australian Associated Press fact check described as “figures who have promoted unfounded conspiracy theories”.[3] The group was founded by Jennifer A. Hibberd and Tess Lawrie, an obstetrician and founder of the “BIRD Group”, which erroneously promotes ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.[4]
The World Council for Health is affiliated with Children’s Health Defense, an antivaccine association led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.[5]
Activities
Further information: Ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic
The World Council for Health promotes misinformation linking COVID-19 vaccination with death.[6] In 2021 the group promoted claims on social media of a “multi-system inflammatory condition” which they called “Post-COVID injection syndrome”. The condition is however not recognized in medical science, and there is no evidence any such condition is caused by vaccination.[3]
In May 2022 the group was involved in a conference in Bath, England which Vice World News described as a meeting of the “biggest names in the global anti-vax and coronavirus conspiracy scenes”. The local authorities withdrew permission to use their venues after reviewing the publicity of the World Council for Health falsely claiming that COVID-19 vaccines were unsafe.[7]
In July 2022, the US-cardiologist Peter McCullough, an anti-vaccine advocate, falsely claimed that vaccinations have been globally recalled due to more than 40,000 deaths worldwide at the request of the World Council for Health. However, the Food and Drug Administration had not listed any recalls for the four COVID-19 vaccines authorised in the US, as confirmed in an email by Abby Capobianco, an agency spokesperson, to AFP.[8]
The UK cardiologist Aseem Malhotra called in September 2022 for the “immediate and complete suspension of Covid-19 vaccine” in a press conference with the World Council for Health, because of “a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19”, repeating his conclusions in a narrative review article in the Journal of Insulin resistance. However, his findings were based on anecdotal evidence, low-quality studies and cherry-picking, where mainly studies that suggested a negative effect of COVID-19 vaccines were cited, and the broader body of evidence showing that the vaccines are safe and effective was not acknowledged.[6][9][10]
The group promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, although research has determined it is ineffective for this purpose.[11]