{"id":7103,"date":"2024-04-20T09:11:13","date_gmt":"2024-04-20T16:11:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/?p=7103"},"modified":"2024-04-20T09:12:59","modified_gmt":"2024-04-20T16:12:59","slug":"breakfast-cereals-scrutinized-for-pesticide-that-may-harm-reproduction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/2024\/04\/20\/breakfast-cereals-scrutinized-for-pesticide-that-may-harm-reproduction\/","title":{"rendered":"Breakfast Cereals Scrutinized For Pesticide That May Harm Reproduction"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>And yet another way the OCGFC are trying to harm you while making money selling the pesticide, and thereby also getting you in their medical and pharmaceutical wealth transfer scheme. And being eugenicists they also like harming reproductive health. It&#8217;s also alarming that it&#8217;s being increasingly used with wheat. So it&#8217;s a good idea to avoid General Mills products as well as other megacorps, and look for organic non-GMO oats and wheat. I purchase large buckets of organic non-GMO wheat berries and mill it myself with a counter top stone mill, <a href=\"https:\/\/mockmill.us\/product\/mockmill-100-stone-grain-mill\/\">Mockmill 100<\/a>, that is quite affordable, and you&#8217;re just about <a href=\"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/2023\/06\/09\/health-benefits-of-fresh-milled-flour\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">doubling up the nutritional value of the wheat<\/a> when freshly milling it as so much is removed for shelf stability. Also, a nod to God for preserving the nutrition so well in the wheat berry which can be stored for a long while and how so much of the world fed itself. And since we can&#8217;t always avoid some of these tainted ingredients especially if you eat out, make sure you&#8217;re getting <a href=\"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/2023\/02\/17\/protecting-yourself-and-your-loved-ones-in-the-face-of-a-chemical-disaster\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">supplements to help detox<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/political\/breakfast-cereals-scrutinized-pesticide-may-harm-reproduction\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/political\/breakfast-cereals-scrutinized-pesticide-may-harm-reproduction<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-ub-divider ub_divider ub-divider-orientation-horizontal\" id=\"ub_divider_58548b55-6adc-4079-bc7f-756edfe56773\"><div class=\"ub_divider_wrapper\" style=\"position: relative; margin-bottom: 2px; width: 100%; height: 2px; \" data-divider-alignment=\"center\"><div class=\"ub_divider_line\" style=\"border-top: 2px solid #ccc; margin-top: 2px; \"><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<p>By Sina McCullough via The Epoch Times <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Imagine starting your day with a bowl of cereal that could be silently affecting your family\u2019s health. <\/strong>Recent studies show that <strong>chlormequat, a pesticide linked to reproductive issues, has been found in popular breakfast cereals like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ewg.org\/news-insights\/news\/2024\/02\/ewg-finds-little-known-toxic-chemical-four-out-five-people-tested\">Quaker Oats and Cheerios.<\/a><\/strong> As this substance infiltrates the American food supply, the potential risks to our health and future generations loom larger, raising urgent questions about the safety of our everyday food choices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41370-024-00643-4\">study<\/a> published in the Journal of Exposure Science &amp; Environmental Epidemiology on Feb. 15, 2024, researchers revealed alarming findings regarding the prevalence of chlormequat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chlormequat was detected in the urine of 4 out of 5 people or 80 percent of Americans tested. Additionally, 92 percent of oat-based foods tested contained chlormequat, including Quaker Oats and Cheerios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This study\u2014the first to report urinary chlormequat measurements in adults living in the United States\u2014highlights the possible widespread presence of chlormequat and the necessity for transparency and further investigation into potential health implications for consumers.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image_92%28242%29.jpg?itok=zO2eA6o-\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image_92%28242%29.jpg?itok=zO2eA6o-\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/inline-images\/image_92%28242%29.jpg?itok=zO2eA6o-\" alt=\"\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">&nbsp;What Is Chlormequat?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Chlormequat, widely known in the salt form as chlormequat chloride, is an agricultural chemical first registered in the United States in 1962 as a plant growth regulator. Plant growth regulators are chemical substances employed to control and regulate plant growth, flowering, and fruit yield, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/16466532\/\">2006 study<\/a>&nbsp;in the International Journal of Andrology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Chlormequat application in grain crops results in reduced stem height, thereby minimizing the occurrence of lodging (bending over), which can reduce the efficiency of the harvesting process.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chlormequat is the world\u2019s most common plant growth regulator according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/32622971\/\">2020 study<\/a> published in Toxicology. \u201cChlormequat is often the most detected pesticide residue in grains and cereals, as documented by monitoring surveys spanning several years,\u201d according to the 2024 study. It is approved for use in Europe and parts of North America.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the United States, chlormequat is permitted exclusively for use on ornamental plants and is prohibited for application on food crops grown within the country. Therefore, the presence of chlormequat in Cheerios and other oat-based foods sold in the United States raises questions regarding its introduction into the food supply chain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How Did Chlormequat Enter the US Food Supply?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In April 2018 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allowed chlormequat into the food supply by establishing acceptable food tolerance levels for chlormequat chloride in imported oats, wheat, barley, and select animal products. This action allowed for the importation and sale of those agricultural products even if treated with chlormequat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Consequently, <strong>U.S. consumers may unknowingly be ingesting tainted imported foods\u2014potentially exposing themselves to chlormequat or its residues.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2020, the allowable chlormequat levels were&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2020\/05\/26\/2020-10331\/chlormequat-chloride-pesticide-tolerances\">increased for oats<\/a>. In April of 2023, the EPA <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/pesticides\/epa-proposes-register-new-uses-pesticide-chlormequat-chloride\">proposed allowing<\/a> the first-ever use of chlormequat on barley, oat, wheat, and triticale grown in the United States. If passed, exposure levels may increase, raising concerns about its implications on health and food safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Heath Concerns Surrounding Chlormequat<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Chlormequat, while not as notorious as other pesticides, has long been linked to reproductive and developmental concerns in animal research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the 1980s, Danish pig farmers observed reproductive declines in pigs consuming chlormequat-treated grains, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1111\/j.1365-2605.2005.00629.x\">2006 article<\/a>&nbsp;in the International Journal of Andrology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The observation led to a controlled laboratory study, which confirmed impaired reproduction. Specifically, <strong>sows fed chlormequat-treated grain experienced impaired reproduction, primarily disruptions in oestrus cycling, and difficulty mating, as cited in the 2006 article.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These findings prompted the Danish pig industry to recommend restricting the use of crops treated with chlormequat and other growth regulators (up to a maximum of 30 percent of diet energy) due to potential reproductive issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Similar findings were observed in 1999 when male mice exposed to chlormequat through food or drinking water demonstrated \u201csignificantly diminished fertilization and cleavage rate\u201d of sperm, indicating a decrease in sperm function, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/10560589\/\">a study<\/a>&nbsp;in Reproductive Toxicology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of significance, the estimated intake of chlormequat in the above mentioned pig (0.0023 milligrams (mg)\/kilograms (kg) body weight (bw) per day) and mouse (0.024 mg\/kg bw\/day) experiments fell below the reference dose published by the EPA (0.05 mg\/kg bw per day) and the acceptable daily intake published by the European Food Safety Authority (0.04 mg\/kg bw\/day), according to the 2024 study. These findings raise concerns regarding the current established limits set by regulatory authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recent studies further demonstrate chlormequat\u2019s reproductive and developmental toxicity, including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Delayed onset of puberty:<\/strong> According to a <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/31689472\/\">2020 study<\/a>&nbsp;in Toxicology Letters, male rats exposed to chlormequat from postnatal day 23 to 60 demonstrated reduced prostate weight and delayed onset of puberty.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Reduced sperm motility:<\/strong> Male rats exposed to chlormequat in utero demonstrated a delayed onset of puberty as well as decreased sperm motility, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S0378427421002058?via%3Dihub\">2021 study<\/a>&nbsp;in Toxicology Letters.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Decreased testosterone:<\/strong> Male adult rats exposed to chlormequat by oral gavage (delivering substances directly to the stomach via a bulb-tipped needle) demonstrated lower testicular weight, decreased sperm motility, and decreased testicular testosterone, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/29447956\/\">2018 study<\/a>&nbsp;in Toxicology Letters.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Moreover, developmental toxicity studies suggest that chlormequat exposure during pregnancy can disrupt fetal growth and metabolism postnatally, indicating a lasting impact on offspring development in rats. For instance, a <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/32622971\/\">2020 study<\/a>&nbsp;published in Toxicology reported maternal exposure to chlormequat in rats led to adverse effects on postnatal health, including hypoglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperproteinemia seven days after birth compared with controls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/17849106\/\">2007 study<\/a>&nbsp;in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry reported detectable levels of chlormequat in blood, as well as its transfer into milk, in pigs exposed to chlormequat. While these markers have not been thoroughly investigated in humans, they raise concerns regarding potential implications for fetal exposure during pregnancy and infants\u2019 exposure through breastfeeding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Some studies have failed to detect significant impacts of chlormequat on reproduction in <a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1111\/j.1365-2605.2005.00629.x\">female mice<\/a> or&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/22444448\/\">male pigs<\/a>, or the fertilization capacity in <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/31301413\/\">male mice<\/a> exposed to chlormequat during development and postnatally. The equivocal findings in the toxicological literature concerning chlormequat could stem from variations in tested doses, outcome measures, and\/or funding sources. According to a <a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1365-2605.2005.00629.x\">2006 study<\/a> in the International Journal of Andrology, \u201cReports from the industry do not show any effects at these low levels.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Aim of New Ground-Breaking Study<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Considering the health concerns underscored in the scientific literature, the goal of the 2024 study was to assess the impact of the EPA\u2019s decision to permit chlormequat in the United States food supply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Study Design<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The 2024 study assessed chlormequat levels in the urine of individuals from three distinct geographic regions in the United States spanning from 2017 to 2023. Specifically, 21 urine samples were gathered in South Carolina in 2017, 25 samples were collected in Missouri from 2017 to 2022, and 50 samples were obtained in Florida in 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The study also examined chlormequat levels in oat and wheat-based products acquired in the United States during 2022 and 2023. Specifically, 25 conventional oat-based food items were analyzed during this period, along with&nbsp;eight organic oat-based products and nine conventional wheat-based food products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Study Results<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Urine Analysis<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Chlormequat was detected in 80 percent (77 out of 96) of urine samples.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The authors noted a rising trend in chlormequat exposure over time, with detection frequencies notably elevated in 2023 samples compared to those from 2017 and the years 2018 to 2022. Specifically, in 2017, 69 percent of samples tested positive, while from 2018 to 2022, 74 percent were positive. In stark contrast, 90 percent of samples in 2023 were positive, representing a significant increase compared to all previous years examined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to the researchers, \u201cThese data indicate likely continuous exposure given the short half-life of chlormequat [2\u20133 hours].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To assess whether the rising concentrations detected in the urine samples reflected potential dietary exposure to chlormequat, the researchers analyzed chlormequat levels in oat and wheat-based food products purchased in the United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Food Exposure Analysis<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The results of the food analysis were equally concerning: a high percentage of conventional oat-based products tested positive for chlormequat, with popular brands like Quaker Oats and Cheerios among those affected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Specifically, 92 percent (23 out of 25) of conventional oat-based products tested positive for the presence of chlormequat, \u201cindicating a high prevalence of chlormequat in oats,\u201d according to the study. This highlights the potential risk posed to consumers, particularly children, who may consume these products regularly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chlormequat was detected in 12.5 percent (one out of eight) of organic oat-based products tested. Additionally, 22 percent (two out of nine) of conventional wheat-based products tested positive for chlormequat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Collectively, the urinary and food exposure data \u201cmay reflect the likely recent introduction of chlormequat into the U.S. food supply due to EPA regulatory action changes involving chlormequat, including establishing a limit on chlormequat in food in 2018 and raising those limits for oats in 2020,\u201d according to the study.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This groundbreaking study sheds light on the possible widespread prevalence of chlormequat in the United States food supply, as documented in both urinary and food exposure analyses. The findings reveal a concerning trend of increasing chlormequat exposure over time, with detection frequencies spiking notably in recent years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chlormequat\u2019s documented toxicological properties, particularly its association with reproductive and developmental issues, raise significant concerns about its long-term effects on human health. Moreover, there is currently <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ewg.org\/research\/ewg-investigation-dangerous-agricultural-chemical-chlormequat-found-popular-oat-based\">no monitoring<\/a> of chlormequat in food products in the United States, leaving consumers vulnerable to potential risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the EPA\u2019s proposed expansion of chlormequat usage on domestically grown crops, the study\u2019s findings serve as a crucial call to action for greater transparency in pesticide usage and monitoring, as well as consumer awareness so we can work toward a food supply that safeguards the well-being of the individual.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And yet another way the OCGFC are trying to harm you while making money selling the pesticide, and thereby also getting you in their medical and pharmaceutical wealth transfer scheme. And being eugenicists they also like harming reproductive health. It&#8217;s also alarming that it&#8217;s being increasingly used with wheat. So it&#8217;s a good idea to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health","category-world"],"blocksy_meta":[],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Jason","author_link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/author\/jturning\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7103"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7103\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7106,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7103\/revisions\/7106"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}