{"id":4740,"date":"2023-08-01T07:22:05","date_gmt":"2023-08-01T14:22:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/?p=4740"},"modified":"2023-08-01T07:22:05","modified_gmt":"2023-08-01T14:22:05","slug":"usda-must-end-dont-ask-dont-tell-policy-on-gmo-vaccines-in-organic-livestock-watchdog-group-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/2023\/08\/01\/usda-must-end-dont-ask-dont-tell-policy-on-gmo-vaccines-in-organic-livestock-watchdog-group-says\/","title":{"rendered":"USDA Must End \u2018Don\u2019t Ask, Don\u2019t Tell\u2019 Policy on GMO Vaccines in Organic Livestock, Watchdog Group Says"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

This is some Tower of Babel genetic modification gone amuck interfering with God’s creation, and the OCGFC have used their corrupt assets to oversee that it’s implemented and hidden from society. And look how they’re using their influence to fight against disclosure and new rules, just like they fought the labeling law in Missouri because pork has been getting injected with mRNA gene therapies since 2018. The conspiracy claims of them poisoning meat to get you to consume bugs and lab grown cancer cell meat among other processed products is looking pretty realistic. After the COVID gene therapies and all the sudden deaths, heart damage, rapid cancers, neurological conditions…. we should “trust the science”? Consequently, this is all pointing to God extracting His children soon so reconcile with God and don’t miss the Rapture<\/a>. Maranatha!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Dr. Max Thornsberry, R-CALF USA animal health committee chair, said in an April briefing<\/a> for R-CALF USA<\/a>, a nonprofit representing the interests of independent U.S. cattle producers, that research has shown mRNA likely passes to humans who have consumed products from an mRNA-injected animal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Research published in JAMA<\/a> also shows the persistence of COVID-19 antibodies in the human breast milk of vaccinated mothers. And recent research showed that Moderna recommended against vaccination of nursing mothers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

Pharmaceutical company Zoetis<\/a> developed an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for animals<\/a> that was administered to animals at zoos throughout the country.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThird-generation vaccines<\/a>,\u201d including DNA, RNA and recombinant viral vector vaccines, are not only currently administered to livestock \u2014 they also are being developed for companion animals and wild animals.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

And the USDA allows<\/a> two \u201cDNA\u201d novel vaccines and avian influenza vaccine for poultry and a swine influenza vaccine.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/usda-policy-gmo-vaccines-organic-livestock\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
Agribusiness watchdog OrganicEye today demanded the U.S. Department of Agriculture hold a public hearing \u2014 or face litigation \u2014 on the use of mRNA and other genetically engineered vaccines in organic livestock production.<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Agribusiness watchdog OrganicEye today demanded the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) hold a public hearing \u2014 or face litigation \u2014 on the use of mRNA and other genetically engineered vaccines<\/a> in organic livestock production.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The use of such genetically modified products violates the legal definition of \u201corganic,\u201d the group said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The request comes after reports that the USDA and some organic certifiers have \u201cquietly looked the other way\u201d as commercial livestock producers have begun using genetically engineered vaccines in animals producing organic-certified meat, eggs and dairy products, according to OrganicEye.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the most important differences \u2014 perhaps the key difference \u2014 between conventional and organic food is the organic label\u2019s strict prohibition on genetically modified farm inputs and ingredients, as laid out in the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OrganicEye said that rather than enforcing this rule, the USDA has sanctioned a \u201cdon\u2019t ask, don\u2019t tell\u201d protocol \u2014 pushed by Big Ag<\/a> \u2014 that allows producers to administer genetically engineered vaccines to animals and still label them \u201corganic.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue is urgent, according to Mark Kastel, executive director of Wisconsin-based OrganicEye<\/a>, because of the imminent use of mRNA vaccines for livestock<\/a>, which are currently being developed with massive funding from government and industry<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe impetus for us to act now is the impending introduction of vaccines for livestock produced using mRNA technology similar to that used by Pfizer and Moderna<\/a> to produce their respective versions of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine,\u201d Kastel stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere is a continuing controversy in the country concerning this new technology and we should work to preserve organics as the last safe haven for eaters who want to secure a truly \u2018natural\u2019 diet,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is \u201cunacceptable,\u201d the nonprofit stated, for the USDA to \u201ckick the can down the road\u201d on this highly controversial issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OrganicEye is calling on the USDA\u2019s National Organic Standards Board<\/a> (NOSB) to convene a meeting of all stakeholders, not only with industry interests who want these vaccines, Kastel told The Defender<\/a>, but also with \u201cpeople who have a concern \u2014 whether they\u2019re farmers that don\u2019t need them and feel they\u2019re being competitively injured by competing against these livestock factories, or whether they\u2019re consumers who have a general concern about genetic engineering and the food supply.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThey have a right to be heard,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A corrupted oversight process<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Synthetic materials are by default banned in organics, unless they have been explicitly permitted because they are deemed \u201cessential\u201d to production and have been evaluated and determined to be safe for human health and the environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Congress created the NOSB in the 1990s to recommend industry standards for regulating such materials. It is a powerful advisory board \u2014 the USDA cannot allow any synthetic substances in organic production unless the NOSB has explicitly approved and recommended them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The board was designed to represent stakeholders from across the organics industry, including small farmers and consumers, but it has increasingly become dominated by powerful agribusiness lobbyists<\/a> \u2014 and as a result, increasingly subordinate to agribusiness\u2019 dictates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first question that must be investigated, Kastel said, is whether vaccines are \u201cessential\u201d for livestock at all. They are generally not required in livestock production \u201cother than some state regulations pertaining to interstate transportation of livestock,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But many producers, particularly in industrial agriculture, vaccinate their animals<\/a> anyway to \u201cmitigate risks.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kastel said a hearing would allow the public to investigate whether \u201cthere\u2019s any good justification coming from anybody other than people involved in conventional livestock production for the use of vaccines.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or, maybe animals \u201cmaintained in a healthy environment<\/a> with plenty of outdoor access and pasture for ruminants like beef and dairy cows on family-scale farms,\u201d don\u2019t need any vaccines at all \u2014 let alone genetically modified ones, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many vaccines previously approved for organic production have been phased out and replaced with vaccines produced through genetic modification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At recent NOSB meetings, accredited organic certifiers admitted that they do not check to see whether vaccines used violate the prohibition against genetic engineering \u2014 despite the fact that federal regulations mandate their review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response, the NOSB recommended the USDA approve a regulatory amendment allowing for the use of these genetically modified vaccines in organic production in cases where the traditionally produced vaccine was no longer available.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a policy brief<\/a> also released today, OrganicEye called this move \u201clikely illegal\u201d because \u201cin all cases, vaccines produced using methods of genetic engineering\/modification are clearly forbidden by the national organic standards and are currently excluded from use.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The USDA did not enact that recommendation and has stated it won\u2019t act in this regulatory area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, Kastel said, the USDA is saying they \u201chave no intention to do new rulemaking,\u201d and are instead letting things stand \u2014 taking a \u201cdon\u2019t ask, don\u2019t tell,\u201d approach to regulating GMO vaccines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dr. Hubert Karreman<\/a>, doctor of veterinary medicine, North Carolina dairy farmer, charter fellow of the American College of Veterinary Botanical Medicine<\/a> and former NOSB member, said that instead, the USDA could and should \u201ccreate a very clear, easily understandable categorization system such that organic farmers don\u2019t use a genetically engineered vaccine by mistake.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OrganicEye charges the USDA\u2019s reluctance to create that system is due to the influence of \u201cpowerful lobbyists and industry interests, mostly with expertise in conventional livestock production as in the case of vaccines,\u201d who have an interest in producers continuing to rely on vaccines, rather than \u201cproviding more healthful and secure living environments for domesticated animals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In its policy brief, OrganicEye proposed the USDA create a clear categorization for vaccines, review all vaccines for safety prior to approval \u2014 including for the persistence of \u201cforeign\u201d DNA, RNA and antibodies in meat<\/a> \u2014 and develop a way to deal with concerns that arise from that review, including removing such vaccines from the market if need be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

OrganicEye is also promoting a campaign to put pressure on the Biden administration<\/a> to reduce its dependence on political appointees from corporate agribusiness in organic regulatory oversight \u2014 a practice that has resulted in the legally questionable conduct the group is protesting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Veterinarians: \u2018Not enough known\u2019 about long-term effects of mRNA vaccines for livestock<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe successful application of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19<\/a> has further validated the platform and opened the floodgates to mRNA vaccine\u2019s potential in infectious disease prevention, especially in the veterinary field,\u201d according to a study<\/a> published last year in the journal Viruses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, Kastel said another reason for holding a public hearing is that there are many open questions about the safety of mRNA vaccines for animals and humans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dr. Max Thornsberry, R-CALF USA animal health committee chair, said in an April briefing<\/a> for R-CALF USA<\/a>, a nonprofit representing the interests of independent U.S. cattle producers, that research has shown mRNA likely passes to humans who have consumed products from an mRNA-injected animal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Research published in JAMA<\/a> also shows the persistence of COVID-19 antibodies in the human breast milk of vaccinated mothers. And recent research showed that Moderna recommended against vaccination of nursing mothers<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This raises questions, Kastel said, about how animals injected with GMO vaccines, particularly for diseases that don\u2019t even affect humans, might introduce new antibodies into the human food supply. The associated risks need to be studied and evaluated, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thornsberry added that mRNA research is \u201cstill in its infancy, no one really knows the full impact it has on either humans or animals, particularly its long-term impact,\u201d and that it, therefore, warrants greater research on safety and greater transparency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Holistic veterinarian Dr. W. Jean Dodds<\/a> told The Defender<\/a> in January that, \u201cNot enough is known at this time if mRNA vaccines can generate any long-term effects on reproduction or lifespan of domestic farm stock.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAs livestock become part of the human and animal food chain, we need to be sure that no abnormal cellular or molecular changes to the animal could be induced by this type of vaccine,\u201d Dodds added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

GMO vaccines already in use, but \u2018no way for consumers to know\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Concerns that mRNA injections could end up in animal products meant for human consumption prompted warnings from cattle producers<\/a> and calls for mandatory country of origin labeling<\/a> so consumers can choose meat from countries that don\u2019t allow mRNA shots in meat animals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Backlash quickly ensued, with legacy media painting the concerns as \u201cconspiracy theories<\/a>,\u201d \u201cfearmongering\u201d and \u201cmisinformation<\/a>,\u201d and issuing a series of misleading \u201cfact checks<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But several new government- and industry-funded studies are, in fact, already underway to develop mRNA vaccines for livestock<\/a>, part of the massive expansion of the animal vaccine industry projected to be worth at least $26.12 billion by 2030<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Researchers at Iowa State University are undertaking a project funded by the USDA to develop mRNA vaccine technology to prevent bovine respiratory syncytial virus<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pharmaceutical company Zoetis<\/a> developed an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for animals<\/a> that was administered to animals at zoos throughout the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And researchers in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service experimented with vaccinating captive-bred black-footed ferrets<\/a> against COVID-19. They also experimented with social distancing and quarantine of ferrets<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThird-generation vaccines<\/a>,\u201d including DNA, RNA and recombinant viral vector vaccines, are not only currently administered to livestock \u2014 they also are being developed for companion animals and wild animals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Merck Animal Health has for several years marketed a \u201ccustomizable vaccine<\/a>\u201d made with \u201cRNA particle technology\u201d to make swine flu and other virus vaccines customized to specific animal herd needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the USDA allows<\/a> two \u201cDNA\u201d novel vaccines and avian influenza vaccine for poultry and a swine influenza vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Citing the need for biosecurity, in September 2022, the New South Wales government<\/a> fast-tracked the world\u2019s first mRNA vaccines for foot-and-mouth disease and lumpy-skin disease, in a five-year multimillion-dollar deal with U.S. biotech company Tiba Biotech<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is no way for consumers to know whether genetically engineered vaccines are being used in livestock to produce USDA-certified organic meat, eggs or milk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

People have a right to this information, Kastel insisted. They also need to know, he said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIs there any deleterious impact? Is it essential? Is it safe? And right now, because GMO vaccines are not legal [in organics], is there really no alternative to them?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOr is that just the spin from the livestock and biotech industry that wants to change over to GMO vaccines?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This is some Tower of Babel genetic modification gone amuck interfering with God’s creation, and the OCGFC have used their corrupt assets to oversee that it’s implemented and hidden from society. And look how they’re using their influence to fight against disclosure and new rules, just like they fought the labeling law in Missouri because […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4740","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health","category-world"],"blocksy_meta":[],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Jason","author_link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/author\/jturning\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4740"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4740\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4741,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4740\/revisions\/4741"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}