{"id":4488,"date":"2023-06-23T10:19:30","date_gmt":"2023-06-23T17:19:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/?p=4488"},"modified":"2023-08-13T08:16:35","modified_gmt":"2023-08-13T15:16:35","slug":"is-a-titanic-conspiracy-theory-tied-to-the-sinking-of-the-billionaire-submersible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/2023\/06\/23\/is-a-titanic-conspiracy-theory-tied-to-the-sinking-of-the-billionaire-submersible\/","title":{"rendered":"Is a Titanic Conspiracy Theory Tied to the Sinking of the Billionaire Submersible?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The part that is of interest is that four industrialists that opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve were on board the Titanic, and that J.P. Morgan whose trust owned the vessel was supposed to be on the voyage. But due to an art issue J.P. Morgan didn’t go, who was for the creation of the Federal Reserve which you might not know is privately owned. At the time J.P. Morgan was the lead American elite working with the English elites who controlled the world. So the theory is that the ship was intentionally sunk with explosives and it didn’t hit an iceberg, possibly to get rid of the resistance to the creation of the Federal Reserve bank system which has ushered in the Century of Enslavement<\/a>. Throw in that a Rothschild was on the board of Oceangate signalling he’s an investor, we have a curious elite connection to the lost submersible. This conspiracy theory might have legs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/thelibertydaily.com\/is-a-titanic-conspiracy-theory-tied-to-the-sinking-of-the-billionaire-submersible\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

By J.D. Rucker<\/a> \u2022 Jun. 23, 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Ever since the sinking of the RMS Titanic in 1912, theories have continuously emerged that questioned the official narrative. Some are ludicrous, such as the one about a cursed mummy onboard that was repeated by the NY Times shortly after the sinking. Some have legs, such as the notion that a German U-Boat sunk her in their quest for WWI sea domination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One theory in particular stands out as not only plausible, but potentially tied to the current tragedy unfolding in the news. According to Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Since no one is offering the conspiracy narrative of the submarine here goes\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well if you read the primary sources of from the survivors of the Titanic you\u2019ll see a disturbing trend: survivor after survivor doesn\u2019t mention an iceberg, they mention an incredible explosion that rocked the ship before it sank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

We\u2019ve all become familiar with the phrase \u201cjet fuel can\u2019t melt steel beams\u201d yet no one is mentioning the obvious: ice bergs can\u2019t cut through hardened steel hulls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So if why would the titanic be blown up?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well it turns out the industrialists opposed to the creation of the federal reserve were on that ship:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1John Jacob Astor IV:
2Benjamin Guggenhei
3Isidor Straus:
4George Dunton Widene<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

This is even mentioned in the movie Titanic, in one scene, were there are a group of people arguing against the creation of the federal reserve. It\u2019s extremely short, a few seconds, but it\u2019s there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately for those behind the conspiracy (presumably the current stockholders of the Federal Reserve) the Titanic sits in international waters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unregulated salvage operations can proceed on the titanic. What would they presumably find?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

That the hull \u201cbuckling in by an iceberg\u201d is actually a \u201cbuckling out by an explosive\u201d. This fact can\u2019t be hidden forever, and the media is starting to tease limited disclosures to the public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To close this loophole, the internationalist are clamping down on visitation so that no unauthorized persons can visit the titanic wreckage without a permit. pic.twitter.com\/wA1DrOWfpj<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

So the fact that this submarine dude was able to offer trips at all is a little suspect. The fact he was able to do it with an uncertified, experimental submarine controlled by a wireless game controller \u2013 makes no sense. The additional fact that he specifically excluded hiring experienced pilots because they were \u201c50 something white people\u201d, yet was still permitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

experienced pilots because they were \u201c50 something white people\u201d, yet was still permitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

So the fact that this submarine dude was able to offer trips at all is a little suspect. The fact he was able to do it with an uncertified, experimental submarine controlled by a wireless game controller \u2013 makes no sense. The additional fact that he specifically excluded hiring experienced pilots because they were \u201c50 something white people\u201d, yet was still permitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

experienced pilots because they were \u201c50 something white people\u201d, yet was still permitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

So what\u2019s going to happen? The people in this submarine likely perished. But I\u2019m open to being wrong. But this event will be used as leverage to make the titanic off limits by visitation by the citizens of the west so that the narrative of the Federal Reserve is preserved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oh look the Rothschild dynasty funded this thing what a surprise. pic.twitter.com\/qNY8nzyecC<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

According to Derek Broes: You are being mislead about the submarine. They did not hear taps and attempts to rescue has resulted is catastrophic failure \u201cimplosion\u201d of two submersibles to rescue. The media wants you tuned into their fake ass broadcasts. The sub is gone according to sources that have contacted me for Canadian a U.S. coast guard insiders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The hull of the Titanic was 1 inch (26 mm) of steel. That puts it in the same league as an “ice breaker ship”, who’s hull ranges from 25 \u2013 75 mm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Zach Vorhies \/ Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) June 22, 2023<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Regarding the Old Theory<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Vorhies mentioned the Rothschild family, whose names have been tied to theories about the Titanic sinking from the beginning. He didn\u2019t mention J.P. Morgan, another Federal Reserve bank architect who had a massive vested interest in seeing opposition to the Fed sunk (pun intended).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

J.P. Morgan owned the Titanic through his trust. He was also scheduled to be a passenger for the disastrous maiden voyage but canceled at the last minute, supposedly because he was having trouble getting artwork shipped with him. This excuse seems feeble considering how much art was already on the ship, but we may never know the truth there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As far as Vorhies\u2019 claim that an iceberg can\u2019t sink a ship with a 1-inch steel hull, its a legitimate question. After all, the hull is one of the reasons the ship was dubbed as \u201cunsinkable\u201d in the first place. I\u2019m not a scientist but the \u201cice versus steel\u201d question seems viable to me.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, let\u2019s discuss how this affects current events\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Regarding the New Theory<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If the submersible was intentionally sunk, hidden away, or never even launched at all, I\u2019m not sure if Vorhies has the full picture. Theorizing that this would be the predicate for preventing future expeditions isn\u2019t realistic. Neither the nature nor location of the dive is being blamed for the tragedy, so changing international law over what is being described as a single faulty submarine doesn\u2019t pass the smell test.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that doesn\u2019t mean there\u2019s no room for a conspiracy, and one stuck out to me based on a victim. Paul-Henri Nargeolet is known as \u201cMr. Titanic.\u201d He\u2019s been to the ship 37 times and is widely regarded as THE expert on the topic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What if he found something that could prove the ship was intentionally sunk? Before you dismiss this as way out there, here are three facts to consider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nargeolet Had a Bad Experience With OceanGate Before<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

This wasn\u2019t Nargeolet\u2019s first time aboard an OceanGate vessel. The last time he went with them, he felt like he was going to die. According to his daughter<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Nargeolet said her father had made his first trip to the wreck in 1987. On one trip in another vessel operated by U.S.-based OceanGate Expeditions<\/strong>, he told her that he was not sure he would return safely<\/strong>, although he eventually did.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Why would someone who had already been to the wreckage 36 previous times get onto another OceanGate submersible after being concerned for his life the last time he went with them? What was so pressing? Did he know something new? Was he investigating something he wasn\u2019t supposed to know?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nargeolet Specialized in Recovering Vehicles Damaged by Explosives<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Before becoming Mr\u2019 Titanic, Nargeolet specialized in mine clearance for the French Navy. He has traveled the world recovering submerged vessels that had exploded. It would be hard to find anyone on the planet who is better qualified to examine the Titanic and recognize evidence of an explosion rather than iceberg damage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nargeolet Was Director of Underwater Research for the Company That Owns the Rights to Titanic\u2019s Remains<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

This seems convenient. According to Daily Mail<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Nargeolet became the director of underwater research for RMS Titanic, which owns the rights to the ship\u2019s remains<\/strong>, and done more than 35 drives to the shipwreck.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Again, this reinforces that if there are true conspiracies surrounding the sinking of the Titanic, Nargeolet would be the one who had access to the information and skill to process it all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So Many Questions<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

He knew the risks and had no known burning need to go down a 37th time on a submersible that nearly killed him before. He\u2019s handled as many vessels sunk by explosives as anyone on earth. He worked for the company that literally owns all of the answers if the right questions are asked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Did Paul-Henri Nargeolet know something he wasn\u2019t supposed to know? Was he going to reveal something the powers-that-be don\u2019t want revealed? As with so many things associated with the Titanic, we may never get real answers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The part that is of interest is that four industrialists that opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve were on board the Titanic, and that J.P. Morgan whose trust owned the vessel was supposed to be on the voyage. But due to an art issue J.P. Morgan didn’t go, who was for the creation of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tech"],"blocksy_meta":[],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Jason","author_link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/author\/jturning\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4488"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4488\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4490,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4488\/revisions\/4490"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}