{"id":3612,"date":"2023-04-10T10:50:46","date_gmt":"2023-04-10T17:50:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/?p=3612"},"modified":"2023-04-10T11:13:10","modified_gmt":"2023-04-10T18:13:10","slug":"judges-abortion-pill-opinion-tells-the-truth-about-unborn-humans-and-the-left-cant-stand-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/2023\/04\/10\/judges-abortion-pill-opinion-tells-the-truth-about-unborn-humans-and-the-left-cant-stand-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge\u2019s Abortion Pill Opinion Tells The Truth About \u2018Unborn Humans,\u2019 And The Left Can\u2019t Stand It"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

With so many officials failing us, lets appreciate a man of conscience who stuck to the facts in ushering in the only opinion that could have been reached, Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk<\/a>. And what a comprehensive ruling that didn’t shy away from anything. And it’s driving the liberal, bloodthirsty, baby murdering Demonrats crazy(ier). His ruling is actually protecting women from their doctors and pharmaceutical companies, per what I’ve read those drugs are dangerous to the mother as well as killing the unborn baby. Of interest, just saw a report that hormonal birth control increases the risk of breast cancer<\/a>, so any hormonal therapy can be dangerous and one of the reasons why transitioning gender dysphoria sufferers have poor life expectancies<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/04\/10\/judges-abortion-pill-opinion-tells-the-truth-about-unborn-humans-and-the-left-cant-stand-it\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

Margot Cleveland<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In his 67-page straight-talking opinion, Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk stuck to the facts \u2014 something Americans desperately need to hear after decades of euphemistic discussions about abortion.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unborn humans.\u201d \u201cEugenics.\u201d \u201cHead, hands, and legs, with defined fingers and toes.\u201d \u201cShame, regret, anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and suicidal thoughts.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Federal Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk\u2019s Friday decision freezing the FDA\u2019s approval of the abortion-pill combination, mifepristone and misoprostol, included these phrases and more. And while the left is already attacking Kacsmaryk\u2019s 67-page straight-talking opinion in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA <\/em>by framing it as filled with anti-abortion<\/a> rhetoric<\/a>, the Trump appointee stuck to the facts \u2014 something Americans desperately need to hear after decades of euphemistic discussions about abortion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After a brief introduction in which Kacsmaryk highlighted the FDA\u2019s two decades of stonewalling that delayed a legal challenge to the 2000 approval of the abortion drugs, the court opened with the basic facts. The plaintiffs \u2014 doctors and medical associations that provide health care to pregnant and post-abortive women and girls \u2014 sued the FDA, challenging several administrative actions related to the approval of the chemical abortion drugs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Unborn Humans\u2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The court then explained the drugs and their functioning: \u201cMifepristone \u2014 also known as RU-486 or Mifeprex \u2014 is a synthetic steroid that blocks the hormone progesterone, halts nutrition, and ultimately starves the unborn human until death.\u201d But \u201cbecause mifepristone alone will not always complete the abortion,\u201d the court continued, \u201cthe FDA mandates a two-step drug regimen: mifepristone to kill the unborn human, followed by misoprostol to induce cramping and contractions to expel the unborn human from the mother\u2019s womb.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Calling an unborn human an \u201cunborn human\u201d immediately triggered abortion activists, but as Kacsmaryk explained in a footnote, such terminology is scientifically correct, whereas the lawyers and courts \u201coften use the word \u2018fetus\u2019 to inaccurately identify unborn humans in unscientific ways.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe word \u2018fetus,\u2019\u201d Kacsmaryk explained, \u201crefers to a specific gestational stage of development, as opposed to the zygote, blastocyst, or embryo stages.\u201d And because the FDA\u2019s approval of the abortion drugs applies at multiple \u201cgestational stages,\u201d the word \u201cfetus\u201d would be inaccurate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is understandable that abortion activists want to hide the humanity of unborn humans, but that doesn\u2019t make the science less real: It just means girls and women who have bought the \u201cclump of cells\u201d narrative will suffer when faced with the truth, which chemical \u201cat home abortions\u201d force. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe mother seeing the aborted human \u2018appears to be a difficult aspect of the medical termination process which can be distressing, bring home the reality of the event and may influence later emotional adaptation,\u2019\u201d the court wrote, based on the record evidence. \u201cFor example, one woman was surprised and saddened to see that her aborted baby \u2018had a head, hands, and legs\u2019 with \u2018[d]efined fingers and toes.\u2019\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another woman alleged that \u201cshe did not receive an ultrasound or any other physical examination before receiving chemical abortion drugs from Planned Parenthood.\u201d According to the record, \u201cThe abortionist misdated the baby\u2019s gestational age as six weeks, resulting in the at-home delivery of a \u2018lifeless, fully formed baby in the toilet,\u2019 later determined to be around 30-36 weeks old.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harm to Women<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Beyond exposing the reality that abortion kills an unborn human, Kacsmaryk\u2019s opinion also refuted the \u201cpopular belief and talking points\u201d that using the abortion pill is \u201cas easy as taking Advil.\u201d Here, the federal judge detailed the factual evidence. Among other things, \u201cbleeding from a chemical abortion, unlike surgical abortion, can last up to several weeks,\u201d and by being done at home, \u201cwithout physician oversight,\u201d it can lead \u201cto undetected ectopic pregnancies, failure of rH factor incompatibility detection, and misdiagnosis of gestational age \u2014 all leading to severe or even fatal consequences.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The opinion also countered the claim that side effects are rare by highlighting evidence that \u201cover sixty percent of women and girls\u2019 emergency room visits after chemical abortions are miscoded as \u2018miscarriages\u2019 rather than adverse effects to mifepristone.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evidence also shows emotional and psychological injury, Kacsmaryk stressed, with 77 percent of women who underwent a chemical abortion reporting \u201ca negative change\u201d after the at-home abortion, and 38 percent of women reporting issues \u201cwith anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and suicidal thoughts because of the chemical abortion.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the abortion industry prefers to cite its own evidence, as Kacsmaryk noted, those studies are flawed both because of the miscoding of chemical abortions as miscarriages and because the FDA stopped requiring the reporting of non-fatal adverse reactions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eugenic Roots<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The left also didn\u2019t like Kacsmaryk exposing the eugenic beliefs of the Population Council, which had sought FDA approval for the abortion drugs. John D. Rockefeller founded the Population Council in 1952, \u201cafter he convened a conference with \u2018population activists\u2019 such as Planned Parenthood\u2019s director and several well-known eugenicists,\u201d the court wrote. Attendees of that conference discussed \u201cthe problem of \u2018quality,\u2019\u201d and concluded that \u201c[m]odern civilization had reduced the operation of natural selection by saving more \u2018weak\u2019 lives and enabling them to reproduce,\u201d thereby resulting in \u201ca downward trend in \u2026 genetic quality.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many Americans remain oblivious to the historical backdrop eugenics played to the abortion movement, and activist groups prefer they remain in the dark. The sunlight Kacsmaryk shined upon that truth infuriates them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Political Pressure<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Judge Kacsmaryk also exposed the political pressure placed on the FDA to approve the abortion drug \u2014 something Americans are likely to appreciate more today in the aftermath of the FDA\u2019s hasty approval of the Covid mRNA shots. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the case of the abortion pill, the FDA took the unprecedented step of arranging a meeting between the French pharmaceutical company that owned the patent rights and the eventual drug sponsor, the Population Council. \u201cThe purpose of the FDA-organized meeting was \u2018to facilitate an agreement between those parties to work together to test [mifepristone] and file a new drug application.\u2019\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Evidence further shows the Department of Health and Human Services \u201cinitiated\u201d another meeting to determine how the Clinton administration \u201cmight facilitate successful completion of the negotiations\u201d between the French firm and the Population Council to ensure the group secure patent rights and eventual FDA approval.\u201d In fact, Clinton\u2019s HHS secretary \u201cbelieved American pressure on the French firm was necessary.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Then after the Population Council submitted a new drug application, the FDA proposed detailed restrictions to address safety concerns, including that the drug be administered by doctors \u201ctrained and authorized by law\u201d to perform surgical abortions; trained in administering mifepristone and treating adverse events; and able to provide treatment at a medical facility that had the equipment necessary to perform surgical abortions, resuscitation procedures, and blood transfusion, within one hour\u2019s drive. The FDA\u2019s restrictions were leaked to the press, prompting a political firestorm. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So Much for Safety<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The FDA later abandoned the above safety mandates and approved the drug for use to kill unborn humans aged seven-weeks gestation or younger. The FDA further required three \u201cin-person office visits: the first to administer mifepristone, the second to administer misoprostol, and the third to assess any complications and ensure there were no fetal remains in the womb.\u201d All adverse events were also required to be reported. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2002, the FDA removed even more of the safety restrictions, increasing the maximum gestational age from seven-weeks gestation to 10-weeks gestation, reducing the number of office visits from three to one, increasing the drug dosage, allowing non-doctors to prescribe and administer chemical abortions, and eliminating the requirement for non-fatal adverse reactions to be reported. Then in 2019, the FDA approved a generic version of the abortion pills, and on April 12, 2021, the FDA announced it would allow abortion pills to be dispensed through the mail. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhether FDA abandoned its proposed restrictions because of political pressure or not,\u201d the court wrote, \u201cone thing is clear: the lack of restrictions resulted in many deaths and many more severe or threatening adverse reactions.\u201d But \u201cdue to FDA\u2019s lax reporting requirements, the exact number is not ascertainable,\u201d Kacsmaryk stressed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Straight Facts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

But it was not on politics that Kacsmaryk based his decision to freeze the FDA\u2019s approval of the abortion pill. Rather, in his methodical opinion, the federal judge explained that the FDA lacked the authority to accelerate approval of the drug under what is called \u201cSubpart H\u201d of the FDA. That subpart only allows for accelerated approval of drugs that treat \u201cserious or life-threatening illnesses\u201d \u2014 something pregnancy is not. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kacsmaryk also concluded the evidence the FDA supposedly relied upon to approve the abortion drugs failed to support the conclusion that they were \u201csafe and effective under particular conditions of use.\u201d And finally, Kacsmaryk held the FDA\u2019s approval of mail distribution violated the 1873 Comstock Act, which makes it illegal to use the mail to deliver any \u201carticle or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Biden administration has already filed a notice of appeal with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and in issuing his opinion in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA,<\/em> Kacsmaryk entered a temporary stay, which he or the court of appeals will likely make permanent pending resolution of the case. Thus, abortion pills will remain available for now. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

How the Fifth Circuit and eventually the Supreme Court will rule remains to be seen, but what is clear now is the abortion-loving left is desperate to keep the truth about abortion from the public and is furious that Kacsmaryk dared to expose the reality: Abortion kills unborn humans.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With so many officials failing us, lets appreciate a man of conscience who stuck to the facts in ushering in the only opinion that could have been reached, Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. And what a comprehensive ruling that didn’t shy away from anything. And it’s driving the liberal, bloodthirsty, baby murdering Demonrats crazy(ier). His ruling is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health","category-world"],"blocksy_meta":[],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Jason","author_link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/author\/jturning\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3612"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3615,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3612\/revisions\/3615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}