One of the things that has always worked in the favor of the cellular industry was that not all people are affected the same way by phone radiation. The RF causes tissue to heat up and some people are more susceptible as this can cause cancer while other people seem to suffer no issues. This could also have a lot to do with other environmental factors like pollutants\/medications… and immune system deficiencies. But back when cellular phones were analog and higher power many people would develop tumors in their heads right where the phone was radiating them and others would not, even among those that used their phones for long periods and often. If nothing else use hands free devices and keep the phone away from you if you need to use it often, and use wifi over cellular data where possible as well as wifi calling if available. Below the quoted article I’ll share frequency and power information. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nThe scientists \u2014 including the former director of the U.S. National Toxicology Program<\/a> (NTP) \u2014 last month published a preprint review<\/a> of the most recent studies on the effects of electromagnetic radiation<\/a> (EMR) and RF radiation on different life forms<\/a> and humans<\/a>, and the epidemiological evidence for cancer due to RF radiation<\/a> from cellphone use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The authors concluded there is \u201csubstantial scientific evidence\u201d that \u201cRF radiation causes cancer, endocrinological, neurological and other adverse health effects\u201d \u2014 and that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has failed to protect public health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
They accused the FCC of ignoring the \u201cPrecautionary Principle<\/a>,\u201d commonly used in toxicology, and also the Bradford Hill criteria<\/a>, a set of principles commonly used in epidemiology for establishing a causal relationship, in evaluating the risks of RF radiation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n