It would appear that the heart damage done by the gene therapy is having too great an effect on pilot availability and the FAA had to change the medical requirements to allow for some of the vaccine injured pilots to continue flying. And the article lists some close calls as pilots have died in the air. Raises the question, why are they still promoting you take additional boosters? And why would anyone trust these people? And pay close attention to the fact that the FAA should never have allowed the pilots to take a highly experimental and untested gene therapy in the first place when it went against their own regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nNow it appears that the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), the body responsible for licensing pilots, has quietly changed the criteria for measuring heart damage in pilots. Until October 2022, pilots were required to pass stringent health tests and have EKG readings of between 0.12 and 0.2. However, from October 26th<\/sup>, the FAA increased that measurement to 0.3. That\u2019s over a 100 percent increase from the low marker. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
As Dr. Thomas Levy, practicing cardiologist and author of the paper \u201cMyocarditis: Once rare, now common<\/em>,\u201d in the journal Orthomolecular Medicine<\/a> News Service, points out, \u201cThis is not a nominal increase in PR interval, but a very large one. In a Harvard study that extended over a 30- to 40-year period<\/a>, it was found that individuals with PR intervals greater than 0.2 seconds had twice<\/em><\/strong> the risk of atrial fibrillation, three<\/em><\/strong> times the risk of needing a pacemaker (meaning the presence of advanced degrees of heart block), and nearly a one and a half<\/em><\/strong> times increase in all-cause mortality. Furthermore, greater degrees of PR interval prolongation led to an even greater risk.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
\nWhile the FAA declined to answer that question when asked by the Tucker Carlson team, Steve Kirsch, the relentless citizen journalist critical of COVID policies, has an idea. \u201cThis is a tacit admission from the US government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage,\u201d he wrote in a January 17th<\/sup> Substack<\/a> post. \u201cI\u2019ll take an educated guess as to why they did that. I believe it is because they knew if they kept the original range, too many pilots would have to be grounded. That would be extremely problematic; commercial aviation in the US would be severely disrupted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cAnd why did they do that quietly without notifying the public or the mainstream media? I\u2019m pretty sure they won\u2019t tell me, so I\u2019ll speculate: it\u2019s because they didn\u2019t want anyone to know. In other words, the COVID vaccine has seriously injured a lot of pilots, and the FAA knows it and said nothing because that would tip off the country that the vaccines are unsafe. And you aren\u2019t allowed to do that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As members of the flying public, we have heard little to no reports on the number of pilots who have collapsed while flying commercial passenger planes. But there are many. A small sample includes a November 22nd<\/sup> Gulf Air flight en route from Bahrain to Paris, forced to make an emergency landing. The pilot was declared dead. Newly hired American Eagle pilot Captain Patrick Ford died on a Chicago to Columbus flight on November 25th<\/sup>, while American Airlines Captain Bob Snow went into cardiac crisis with heart arrhythmia on his approach to Dallas airport. He collapsed after landing and was only resuscitated with three electric shocks to his heart. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n