By Frank Bergman<\/p>\n\n\n\n The World Council for Health has issued a chilling red alert to the public to warn of a \u201cticking time bomb\u201d of looming deaths, disease, and injuries among the billions of people who received Covid mRNA \u201cvaccines.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The warning comes as global health bureaucrats and pharmaceutical giants continue pushing<\/a> Covid mRNA shots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, these new revelations about the chemical delivery system used in these injections are now sending shockwaves through scientific communities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At the center of the controversy is lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which serve as \u201cbiological grenades\u201d in the bodies of those who received the experimental injections..<\/p>\n\n\n\n LNPs are microscopic synthetic fat particles used to deliver mRNA into human cells.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Originally sold as cutting-edge \u201csafe and effective\u201d technology, these LNPs are now under scrutiny for potential long-term toxicity, metabolic disruption, and triggering of autoimmune or neurodegenerative conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite these concerns, after billions were injected with unvetted nano-tech, Pfizer, Moderna, and government regulators are stonewalling even basic safety questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One basic question that remains unanswered: How many LNPs are in a single Covid \u201cvaccine\u201d dose?<\/p>\n\n\n\n When eminent German researcher Maria Gutschi tried to find out, she got a disturbing response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Gutschi hit mRNA \u201cvaccine\u201d maker Moderna with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, according to Gutschi, Moderna\u2019s response<\/a> was:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWe don\u2019t know, and it\u2019s irrelevant.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Gutschi said she also presented the same question to the UK\u2019s drug regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), but didn\u2019t receive a response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This lack of transparency has alarmed experts and watchdogs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to a report from the World Council for Health (WCH):<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cBillions of people have been injected with a poorly characterised chemical delivery system \u2013 and now we\u2019re just starting to see the fallout.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The WCH warns that the injections are \u201cacting like a slow-release poison,\u201d which has created a \u201cticking time bomb\u201d among the global population.<\/p>\n\n\n\n German researcher Genervter B\u00fcrger<\/a> reports that only one scientific paper includes mass and numerical data of LNPs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The study detected<\/a> Moderna\u2019s SM-102, an ionisable lipid, lingering in the bloodstream seven days post-injection, still above background levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Keep in mind \u2014 this is a synthetic, non-human lipid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As B\u00fcrger explains, comparing it to \u201cbackground levels\u201d is like saying a trace of arsenic in your coffee is fine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Meanwhile, Pfizer\u2019s proprietary lipid, ALC-0315, has its own set of issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fresh vials showed 0.19% oxidized impurities, and the most reactive components weren\u2019t even fully tested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And oxidized lipids? They\u2019re \u201cbiological grenades\u201d that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n A landmark scientific review, The Chemical Reactivity of Membrane Lipids, warned:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhen primary amines are present in membranes (e.g., sphingosine), reactive aldehydes can crosslink them, triggering vesicle aggregation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n In layman\u2019s terms: these particles don\u2019t just deliver mRNA \u2014 they can wreak havoc on cell membranes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n From cholesterol ratios that accelerate lipid breakdown to tertiary amines that interfere with cellular receptors, the evidence suggests that slow, systemic toxicity from these particles may be flying completely under the radar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The unanswered question: Were some batches more toxic than others?<\/p>\n\n\n\n With no batch consistency data released, the public may never know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWe need transparency from both the vaccine manufacturers and drug regulators,\u201d the WHC warns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That means batch testing, LNP quantification, oxidation monitoring, and \u2014 most critically \u2014 long-term follow-up to understand how long these synthetic particles linger and what damage they might cause.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As the World Council for Health continues to push for the withdrawal of these experimental gene therapies, the silence from Big Pharma and public health agencies is deafening \u2014 and deeply troubling.<\/p>\n\n\n https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/World_Council_for_Health<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n The World Council for Health<\/strong> is a pseudo-medical<\/a> organisation dedicated to spreading misinformation<\/a> to discourage COVID-19 vaccination<\/a>, and promoting fake COVID-19 treatments<\/a>.[1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n The organization’s online appearance is that of a mainstream health organization.[2]<\/a><\/sup> It appears to have been formed in September 2021 and its published leadership contains people which an Australian Associated Press<\/a> fact check described as “figures who have promoted unfounded conspiracy theories”.[3]<\/a><\/sup> The group was founded by Jennifer A. Hibberd<\/a> and Tess Lawrie<\/a>, an obstetrician<\/a> and founder of the “BIRD Group”, which erroneously promotes ivermectin<\/a> as a COVID-19 treatment.[4]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n The World Council for Health is affiliated with Children’s Health Defense<\/a>, an antivaccine<\/a> association led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.<\/a>[5]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n Further information: Ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n The World Council for Health promotes misinformation linking COVID-19 vaccination with death.[6]<\/a><\/sup> In 2021 the group promoted claims on social media of a “multi-system inflammatory condition” which they called “Post-COVID injection syndrome”. The condition is however not recognized in medical science, and there is no evidence any such condition is caused by vaccination.[3]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n In May 2022 the group was involved in a conference in Bath, England<\/a> which Vice World News<\/em> described as a meeting of the “biggest names in the global anti-vax and coronavirus conspiracy scenes”. The local authorities withdrew permission to use their venues after reviewing the publicity of the World Council for Health falsely claiming that COVID-19 vaccines were unsafe.[7]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n In July 2022, the US-cardiologist Peter McCullough<\/a>, an anti-vaccine advocate, falsely claimed that vaccinations have been globally recalled due to more than 40,000 deaths worldwide at the request of the World Council for Health. However, the Food and Drug Administration<\/a> had not listed any recalls for the four COVID-19 vaccines authorised in the US, as confirmed in an email by Abby Capobianco, an agency spokesperson, to AFP.[8]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n The UK cardiologist Aseem Malhotra called in September 2022 for the “immediate and complete suspension of Covid-19 vaccine\u201d in a press conference with the World Council for Health, because of “a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19”, repeating his conclusions in a narrative review article in the Journal of Insulin resistance. However, his findings were based on anecdotal evidence, low-quality studies and cherry-picking, where mainly studies that suggested a negative effect of COVID-19 vaccines were cited, and the broader body of evidence showing that the vaccines are safe and effective was not acknowledged.[6]<\/a><\/sup>[9]<\/a><\/sup>[10]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/spcdn.shortpixel.ai\/spio\/ret_img,q_cdnize,to_webp,s_webp\/slaynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/child-covid-vaccine-cancer-mrna-dna-contamination-fda-study.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
World Council for Health (Wikipedia)<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
Activities<\/h2>\n\n\n\n