{"id":10227,"date":"2025-01-08T09:45:13","date_gmt":"2025-01-08T16:45:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/?p=10227"},"modified":"2025-01-08T09:45:13","modified_gmt":"2025-01-08T16:45:13","slug":"canadian-doctors-suggest-harvesting-organs-from-euthanasia-patients-before-theyre-dead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonsblog.ddns.net\/index.php\/2025\/01\/08\/canadian-doctors-suggest-harvesting-organs-from-euthanasia-patients-before-theyre-dead\/","title":{"rendered":"Canadian Doctors Suggest Harvesting Organs From Euthanasia Patients Before They\u2019re Dead"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

I mentioned MAiD in the last post<\/a>, and this gem popped up. Pay close attention to just how vile these white coats are as they are emboldened to show their depravity. And just look at how they’re going wild making money mutilating people who have been infected with cultural gender dysphoria, and particularly children. Do you trust these white coats with your life? Are you going to trust their science? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2025\/01\/08\/canadian-doctors-suggest-harvesting-organs-from-euthanasia-patients-before-theyre-dead\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n
Medical freedom advocates are documenting emerging ties between \u2018medical assistance in dying\u2019 and organ harvesting.<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

By: Logan Washburn<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Canadian doctors have suggested killing euthanasia victims by taking their organs, according to multiple reports, whistleblowers, and public talks. Medical freedom advocates are documenting emerging ties between \u201cmedical assistance in dying\u201d (MAID) and organ harvesting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe best use of my organs, if I\u2019m going to receive a medically assisted death, might be to not first kill me and then retrieve my organs, but to have my mode of death \u2014 as we medically consider death now \u2014 to be to retrieve my organs,\u201d said<\/a> Rob Sibbald, an ethicist of the London Health Sciences Centre in Ontario.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sibbald spoke on \u201cThreats to the Concept of Brain Death: Ethical Reflections\u201d at the Critical Care Canada Forum<\/a> in November 2018.The event was sponsored by Canadian Blood Services<\/a>, a tissue and organ donation group; the Trillium Gift of Life Network<\/a>, which is \u201cresponsible for delivering and coordinating organ and tissue donation and transplantation across the province\u201d of Ontario; and the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program<\/a>, which hopes to \u201cincrease the availability of transplants.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other Canadian doctors have publicly embraced<\/a> \u201cdeath by donation,\u201d and a study<\/a> came out earlier this year exploring euthanasia programs such as MAID as a means of organ harvesting. Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016, and since then the number of Canadians using MAID to kill themselves has significantly<\/a> increased.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Is the Dead Donor Rule Even Relevant?\u2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Sibbald\u2019s biography says<\/a> he co-directs the \u201cCanadian unit of the International Network of the UNESCO chair in bioethics.\u201d During his speech, he suggested blurring the lines on the \u201cdead donor rule,\u201d a long-standing medical ethics guideline<\/a> requiring that donors die of another natural cause before doctors harvest their organs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe\u2019re so invested in this dead donor rule,\u201d Sibbald said. \u201cThat rule has become so ingrained in the medical community that we hold it out as a foundational principle. \u2026 And I think just as likely there are people who question that value now. And I know there\u2019s perhaps not an appetite to go there, but raising the question \u2014 is the dead donor rule even relevant?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n